Paleolithic Essay Example

The lifestyle and living situation of the paleolithic times were much more straightforward and different from those of today's way of living. For example, their way of living was all about survival, food gathering, and repeating the same tiring routines over and over to survive. However, it is more about finding a purpose in life and giving it a more extensive meaning and purpose than just survival in today's lifestyle and for example, starting with tools and ways of making survival easier in the first place, which makes sense, therefore, knocking out survival as a challenging task slowly until agriculture hits humanity. First off, we have beforehand: collecting crops was tiring and took lots of effort and time to remove the plant properly. Nevertheless, they invented sickles, hoes, and more to help farmers and collect crops during agriculture. Agriculture is an excellent thing because it helped us humans do things much faster, much quicker, and more efficiently, thus faster and easier to gain food, which also means an easier way to survive. In today's society, in the Neolithic period, it is so easy to gain food and water by using our newly invented tools thanks to agriculture such as machines, farms, barns, more tools like shovels, animal feeders, and so much more. Look at the first graph on page one in Timeline and Images with the correct evidence to back up this claim. The graph shows that before agriculture that it would most likely be complicated and time-consuming even to try to tame a horse for usage for survival but afterward, we can see it was so much easier, and the first usage of a sickle was just the baby steps of getting to the bigger, and more complex yet valuable inventions. Another piece of valuable evidence is in Source two in the Khan Academy video. At time stamp 5:10, it is shown that before agriculture, the population was only ten million people worldwide. Can anyone imagine how crazy that would be in the Neolithic period? Insane. It has shown that after agriculture, the population sky-rocketed, leading to more people, more ideas, more inventions, and more evaluation and progression, making agriculture a positive effect on humanity.

Now let us move on to our next topic of family and shelters. Now it has been proven on Page two, source 3, Prehistoric Times: A Stone Age Family, that it says, "However, Neanderthals did things that we think only modern humans do. For instance, they cared for their sick. One skeleton is that of a man who was 40 years old whose bones showed that he had severe arthritis and had lost most of his teeth. It would have been almost impossible for him to live

40 years unless someone took care of him." which therefore means that family was an essential part of paleolithic lifestyle, but it could not progress. The progression of humans is not only about survival. It is also about emotion. Now, if we look at source six about the Omani Bedouins, we know from the whole article that this is the neolithic period, and we can see in paragraph six that they discuss how they have tents that are for the whole family, and we can tell that after agriculture these families developed more emotion and more sense about each other. Not only is family important in today's society to function and have a better and prosperous place in our society, but it also helps with population and reproduction, therefore, making agriculture positive again by showing that we need it in order to keep a stable society emotionally and not only physically. 

The final topic to discuss to prove how agriculture has a positive effect on humanity is linguistic factors. Now, this plays a significant part in our society today. Without agriculture, we would have never learned how to talk or communicate properly. I would not be able to write this paper now, and you would not be able to read it! Without agriculture, our life as we know it would be far more complicated. How would we communicate how we would overcome and discuss problems together as a society? Without agriculture, that would be impossible, and it is a positive here because humanity would be suffering and struggling greatly to solve issues without linguistic skills. For example, let us say someone goes to the store to buy a box of cookies. How can they tell it is a box of cookies and not a box of macaroons? How can they tell its price? How may they tell the cashier they do not have change? How can they even know if they entered the correct store in the first place?

Everything would be used in pictures making life more complicated and confusing overall. A valuable piece of evidence to back up this claim is source number ten, where on page two, they discuss how people struggled to show more significant numbers, see without the development of more tools and paper. Pen, it would be complicated to show such large numbers, but now in the neolithic period we have computers, over 200 languages and papers and pens and now we can write and show those more significant numbers and makes it more accessible. Without agriculture, that would be too difficult and, quite frankly, annoying to deal with writing so many large numbers. Another example of using for comparison is in source number nine. On page one, paragraph three, it discusses how when that person thought of a 'dog,' every single image of a dog-related thing popped into their head. Can you imagine how frankly, how inconvenient that is? For example, if someone could not talk or read and had to find something of their missing belongings, how would they do that? They would have to gesture and draw it out, and they would not be able to tell someone else the name of the specific object. It would be an entire game of charades until the person who can speak can understand them. Therefore without agriculture, we would not have a way to communicate, a significant inconvenience to humanity.