Ralph Waldo Emerson's Education Analysis Essay

Every morning, children set their alarm clocks early to travel to a place that no one enjoys: school! They're all thinking about the same thing: how much longer till they can depart. With blank, empty expressions, they are forced to look at white walls and white boards. Can you imagine going to a school where you are truly looking forward to going?Yeah, neither did I, but in Ralph Waldo Emerson's book Education, he explains how humanity may be reintroduced into classrooms and how the ideal form of learning should allow youngsters to enjoy going to school. And I wholeheartedly support his principles. His vision of a personal, yet challenging, learning environment should be applied throughout the school district by changing the curriculum and educating us students to pursue our passions and learn what we want to know.

Many lecturers nowadays are willing to provide answers to students who have not even attempted to solve the topic. This method of spoon-feeding answers allows students to achieve without fully comprehending the content; nevertheless, when they are tested on the material, they will struggle to do well because they did not learn on their own. As a result, Emerson's concept of independent education would allow students to challenge themselves to create answers independently, without the immediate assistance of a teacher, ensuring that they have a better comprehension of the material. However, no mechanical or military approach is to be fulfilled in this job of opening and feeding the human mind, (Emerson, 191). This highlights how providing children the correct answers immediately is both unnatural and the worst strategy for them to remember information. Apart from imposing responses on children who are unable to build them on their own. 

He calls today's school fascist and explains why he thinks learning should be "natural." He means "natural" when he says learn via experience. Emerson's ideal educational experience is one in which students are free to pursue their passions and learn what they want to learn. All of our schools in our district should use the "natural method." The "natural method" has the advantage of allowing pupils and even teachers to be enthusiastic about what they are learning and teaching. Children will be more likely to want to come to school and study as a result of this. The zeal with which a student approaches learning is useful in the long run. If both teacher and the student are enthusiastic, the atmosphere is considerably more positive and productive.

Some may argue that Emerson's faith in each student is hopelessly romantic and terribly impracticable. But, as you can see, he has the education issue in his grip. He recognizes and, more significantly, welcomes diversity among students. He gives us a beginning point, the observation of individual learners and a knowledge of their diverse interests, abilities, personalities, and capacities, which holds a far more realistic promise than the standard people's insistence on a necessary curriculum for all. He gives courage to those who want to question the existing wisdom of educational thinking and practice, and he reminds us throughout his articles that the current wisdom of educational thought and practice is not absolute.

Anyone who has read Emerson knows that he is wary of heroes and sages influencing modern thinkers and activists. His work is there to encourage new thinking and practice, not as a relic to be worshipped or a sacred text to be copied, as he made clear when speaking about others. We can use the inspiration to learn topics we really want to learn and be challenged in ways we've never been challenged before. You have to acknowledge that school is a drag, but this might help to make it more palatable, as it once did when we had nap time and recess all those years ago.