Research Paper on Robots Replace Jobs

The last few decades have seen the utilization of robotics and AI in enhancing human capabilities and improving work efficiency. Under this circumstance, some individuals are concerned that robots will take over jobs from humans, leading to increasing unemployment rates. However, there are two informative and helpful articles presenting opposite viewpoints on this matter. Corina Pelau, Irina Ene, and Mihai-Ionut Pop investigated both the advantages and disadvantages of robots on some human aspects and reported the findings in their paper ‘The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Consumers' Identity and Human Skills’. Contrastly, another article by Peter Fleming, entitled ‘Robots and Organization Studies: why Robots Might Not Want to Steal Your Job’ delves deeper into whether AI technology might pose a threat on human-intensive employment in the future. It is certain that both publications contribute to the reader's understanding of the impacts of robotics and AI technologies on society and their vital role in many facets of human existence, including social circles, abilities, and identity, in both positive and negative ways.

The main purpose of Pelau, Ene, and Pop’s research is to assess the relationship between three factors: the influence of efficiency and AI interest, the impact of social circle, and the awareness of resolving a customer's identity. In addition, this study conducted a questionnaire survey and a mediation model to investigate the relationship between AI's benefits and customer apprehension. Furthermore, the authors used a variety of significant and well-organized data to evaluate four hypotheses in the study and emphasize consumers' acceptance of AI. Overall, although it is stated that the advantages of using AI diminish the consumer’s apprehensions about its application, the necessity of prudent use and approach to robots and AI technology are necessary to be considered.  

In contrast, Fleming pursued a different objective. He explicitly stresses the critical role of AI and bounded automation which might affect various social issues and examines how technologies could reinforce the institution of work.  Nonetheless, the author hypothesizes that despite the advancement of AI technology and computerization, the position for prospective occupations will not vanish. Besides, robotic mechanization is structured and restricted by labor costs, organizational power dynamics, and the nature of tasks, all of which are interconnected at different stages. Furthermore, three suggestions are concluded to reduce the number of labor seemingly dominated by robots, including cultivating worker skills, organizing employees’ unions, and reducing people’s reliance on jobs. 

Pelau, Ene, and Pop have done well-delivered work of disseminating information as well as structuring and choosing data in their work. The authors developed a proven hypothesis by using clear tables of findings, relevant references, and particular statistics or percentages, which assist readers in comprehending the substance of the paper. On balance, it would have been preferable to describe the new knowledge in greater depth and detail in the literature review rather than simply listing these ideas without explanation, which leaves readers perplexed and inquisitive. Nonetheless, the authors have presented all sides of the argument, which helps viewers gain a more balanced and comprehensive understanding of the link between AI's benefits and user’s concerns. As a consequence, The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Consumers' Identity and Human Skills is a strong article with strengths in depth, reasoning, and persuasion by using credible evidence, examples, or data, and the limitations that only account for a tiny part of the paper.

Conversely, Robots and Organization Studies: why Robots Might Not Want to Steal Your Job is likely to have more defects. The most evident flaw is the headings of all paragraphs appear to be unsupportive and distinct. They fail to cover all of the essential features of the subsequent sections, which causes confusion and misunderstanding among readers about the points the writers intend to emphasize. Fleming also misused acronyms and was unlikely to strictly follow academic specifications for the language and structure. It may be argued that the author was unquestionably competent to write on the subject due to his profound understanding and extensive study into theories and previous literature. However, this study uses a lot of outdated examples that are inappropriate for recent times. As a result, Fleming should be able to overcome his paper's rambling, illogical arrangement, and lack of conviction.

In conclusion, although there are some limitations, both articles provide valuable additions to readers' understanding of robots and AI technology in human life. Pelau, Ene, and Pop's article may be read by readers who want to learn more about the impact of AI on customer's identities and abilities thanks to its clarity and persuasiveness will assist to paint a clear picture. Simultaneously, readers interested in learning more about the impact of high technology on employment rates and the labor pool should read Fleming's research, since it is accurate in the current circumstance and maybe in the near future.