Should Animal Cloning Be Banned Essay Example

You are a cold and small animal, born into this world, just to be slaughtered and eaten. Who would have thought that you would be birthed into the world just to be treated as nothing more than a slave of humanity. Every single day, you bear witness to the slaughter, but powerless to stop it. You wish for nothing but the nightmare of fear and blood would end. But little did you know, something is here to extinguish that nightmare. A large majority of people today deem animal cloning as harmful, but cloning should be continued as it brings massive benefits to both people and animals.

The evidence from the article, “Animal Clones: Double trouble?” by Emily Sohn implies that there are huge benefits when it comes to animal cloning. In the same article by Emily Sohn as mentioned before, it mentions, “If scientists could clone these exceptional cows (45,000 lbs of milk per year), fewer cows would be needed to make milk.” Because we can clone animals with better milk or possibly even meat, we would not need to breed as many cows as before. Emily Sohn also remarked in the article “Animal Clones: Double trouble?” that “cloning these animals (brucellosis resistant) could produce a whole herd of disease free animals, saving farmers millions of dollars in lost meat.” If cloning disease resistant animals saves money and animals, then it implies cloning brings massive benefits to both sides by saving both our health and our money. Cloning is a beneficial way to save money while keeping animals safe, but receiving even more safe meat or milk in the process.

Even with these strong reasons and evidence, one may still believe cloning should be banned. In the article “Animal Cloning: Double trouble?”, Emily Sohn demonstrated that cloning can produce exceptional animals with important traits. Some may be led to believe that even with the ability to clone exceptional animals, the mortality rate is extremely high and success is low, deeming that it is unsafe and is not needed. However, there is evidence that reasonably goes against this; the research is not complete and the benefits of a successful cloning. Because the benefits of cloning are so great, they would outweigh the cons by many times when research is completed or done enough to clone successfully. The fact that successful cloning has many more benefits and aids to animals and people than downsides implies that cloning should be continued, contrary to many other beliefs.