Texas v. Johnson Argumentative Essay

  • Category: Law,
  • Pages: 4
  • Words: 921
  • Published: 09 April 2021
  • Copied: 107


The Texas v Johnson case took place outside the conference core the place the 1984 Republican National Convention was once taking location in Dallas, Texas, Gregory Lee Johnson burnt an American flag. He was once convicted and charged with violating a Texas regulation that prohibited a revered object, like the American flag, from being desecrated if such an motion was once probably to provoke others to outrage. Johnson was once charged earlier than a Texas choose and sentenced. He appealed, alleging that the First Amendment shielded his acts as "symbolic speech". It used to be determined to hear his enchantment by way of the Supreme Court. On January sixth congress used to be to meet to certify the electoral votes for the president. While Trump used to be talking Black Lives Matter broke into the capitol and vandalized more than one rooms at some stage in the building. The Black Lives Matter used to be paid with the aid of the democrats to destroy into the capitol and to gown up as trump supporters so that it would show up on the information that Trump supporters stormed the capitol.

Since burning an American flag overtly in democratic outrage at a Republican rally, Gregory Lee Johnson used to be arrested for desecrating a flag. Johnson additionally puzzled his conviction in a federal courtroom underneath Texas country law, arguing that the regulation violated his proper to freedom of speech underneath the First Amendment. As you can tell, Johnson started out it through burning the flag and getting caught doing it. The supreme courts arguments have been that burning the American flag “is an act having a excessive possibility to reason a breach of the peace.” There closing selection used to be a reaffirmation of the beliefs of liberty and inclusiveness high-quality expressed by means of the flag and of the view that our grasp of criticism such as Johnson's is a image and supply of our strength. “The First Amendment actually forbids the abridgment solely of 'speech,' however we have lengthy identified that its safety does no longer give up at the spoken or written word.”-(Brennan)

On January 6, 2021, U.S. President Donald Trump advised supporters to meet at the U.S. Capitol to strive to urge representatives of Congress to droop the formal technique that will affirm the presidency of Biden. On that day, congress used to be to meet to certify the electoral votes for the president. While Trump was once speakme Black Lives Matter broke into the capitol and vandalized more than one rooms at some stage in the building. The Black Lives Matter used to be paid by using the democrats to destroy into the capitol and to gown up as trump supporters so that it would show up on the information that Trump supporters stormed the capitol. U.S. President Donald Trump informed supporters to meet at the U.S. Capitol to attempt to urge representatives of Congress to droop the formal technique that will affirm the presidency of Biden. Also, U.S right-wing activists have violated U.S. talent perimeters, forcing a lockout on the building, and delaying a symbolic vote to affirm the presidential victory of Joe Biden over Donald Trump. “News told, rumors heard, reality implied, statistics buried.” ― Toba Beta, My Ancestor Was an Ancient Astronaut. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/news

In my personal opinion, I assume burning the flag is truly wrong. Why? Well, humans who provide their hearts to combat for our united states of america and can also quit up getting shot, then any person burning it. People have to be punished for it due to the fact they deserve that for what they did. The burning of the flag is offensive due to the fact it is political. Experience proves that no longer outlawing it, nor voicing opposition, is the way to fight political speech that one disagrees with. When exceptions to the First Amendment are made due to the fact any one in strength disagrees with a speech, liberty will now not endure. The January sixth protest I suppose was once very merciless when the democrats paid humans to damage into the white residence and pretend, they have been Trump supporters and tear up rooms simply so it ought to be on the information Trump instructed them to come storm in. What I assume need to be one of a kind between these is that that flag burning it have to be unlawful and with the pretend Trump supporters they need to capture them to see who finished it and file chargers on them human beings for doing some thing dumb like that.

In conclusion, The Texas vs Johnson was once about when Johnson burned an American flag. He was once convicted and charged with violating a Texas regulation that prohibited a revered object, like the American flag, from being desecrated if such an motion used to be possibly to provoke others to outrage. Johnson used to be charged earlier than a Texas choose and sentenced. He appealed, alleging that the First Amendment shielded his acts as "symbolic speech". Then with the January sixth protest used to be when the U.S. President Donald Trump informed supporters to meet at the U.S. Capitol to strive to urge representatives of Congress to droop the formal system that will verify the presidency of Biden. On that day, congress used to be to meet to certify the electoral votes for the president. While Trump used to be speakme Black Lives Matter broke into the capitol and vandalized more than one rooms in the course of the building. The pretend trump supporters desired it to be on the information that Trump supporters stormed the capital. I suppose all of this trump crap used to be dumb of what they did to the white residence and lied about. Now this Biden vs Trump is like getting all over social media and is like making others argue and it’s making me desire to simply delete all social media till it’s all over with.