The Hyper-Globalist and Transformationalist View of Globalization Essay Example

This essay seeks to describe how hyper-globalizers and transformationalists understand globalization, using their similarities and differences. It also seeks to discuss one way in which covid 19 pandemic support and challenges the hyper-globalizers perspective.

Globalization is the increasing interdependence and interconnectedness of the world economies and cultures due to the numerous developments of technology, multiplicity, communication networks, and market relation allowing the flow of information, physical movement, goods, and services around the globe much faster and easier (Giddens and Sutton 2013). This formulation of interconnectedness and interdependency throughout the globe is known as globalization (Giddens and Sutton 2013).    

The hyper-globalizers understand globalization in terms of its level of influence in the reduction of the significance of national borders producing a new global era, where there is an increase in economic interdependence and interconnectedness leading to a boardless world (Giddens and Sutton 2013). which is in unison with the transformationalist belief that globalization is breaking down the established boundaries around the world. But on the contrary, it further states that globalization is not only restricted to economies alone but equally prominent in the realms of politics, culture, and personal life (Giddens and Sutton 2013).

hyper-globalizers stance on globalization centers around the nation-states being rendered a loss in control because of the eminence of neo-liberalism accompanied by exerted pressure from international organizations (and the European Union) such as the World Trade organization (Giddens and Sutton 2013). The hyper-globalizers view nation-state as losing control in their economies to what goes in and out of their nations because of the world trades growth rendering the nation-states powerless and the private sectors controlling their economies without government interventions whereby in previous eras the government would negotiate for their countries (Giddens and Sutton 2013). The hyper-globalizers emphasize the impact of globalization in stripping away powers from the nation-states. taken together these shifts signal to the hyper-globalizers, the beginning of a global age in which national governments' importance and their influence are declining (Giddens and Sutton 2013).

 in a complementary manner, the transformationalists also point to globalization as being the catalyst for change on various levels as aforementioned (Giddens and Sutton 2013). Contrary, to hyper-globalizers emphasis on nation-states having lost control, transformationalists contentions highlight a situation wherein the government having been subjected to these transformative changes of globalization and has not entirely lost control as contended by hyper-globalizers rather it highlights the governments need to adjust and adapt to the changes that globalization and that goes for other fraternities of everyday life/affairs (Giddens and Sutton 2013). The hyper-globalizers stance on governments loss of power and influence and that they foresee a world that is borderless and the governments importance and influence is declining, while the transformationalists emphasize globalization as bringing changes in a broader sense and affecting many aspects in a contradictory opposing fashion which in turn makes it an open process subjected to influence and change and thus unpredictable for us to conclude as to what the future will be as done by hyper-globalizers, as the process will be an ongoing one, dependant on how societies and nation-states react to globalization (Giddens and Sutton 2013).

The hyper globalizers view on globalization is in a sense supported by the covid 19 pandemic, in that prior to the advent covid19, globalization was actually at play in that there was intensified economical interconnectedness and interdependences in the world, economies were working together throughout the globe undermining the national borders thus the world economies were united ( Yaya 2020) this was evident in the fast and efficient ways of trading routes and relaying of essential services, products, etc, vice versa. all this was done independently of the state via technological means etc so the emergence of covid 19 couldn’t have shown the presence of globalization better in the changes that took place, where the governments were compelled to implement isolation and shutdown their countries in protecting themselves from the containment of the virus, followed by cuts to global supply so the developed nations were affected but especially the developing nations as they depend mostly on exporting their products (Yaya 2020). So, to an extent, hyper-globalizers perspectives were supported by covid 19 as the world’s economies were interdependent and interconnected but the emergence of covid 19 reversed the globalization process as borders were being closed and strict measures being taken so for anyone who does not really see or understand globalization the changes brought by covid19 actually show what globalization really is.

 Covid 19 also challenges the hyper-globalizers perspective that during the pandemic the global event failed to produce an effective response across the globe as the result of increased interconnectedness and interdependence ( Enderwick 2020). Instead, nations pursued disparate responses of cutting global trade supply chain between the countries protecting themselves from the containment of the virus, whereby the nation-state had powers in taking charge of their countries (  Enderwick 2020 ).hence there was the debate of changing to regionalization focus as covid 19 brought the shortcomings of globalization to light ( Enderwick 2020). The hyper-globalizers perspective had viewed the nation-states as declining in its importance and influence ironically, on the contrary, during the covid 19 pandemic the nation-states took charge of their respective,  nations amid the pandemic, being at the forefront of decision making and the overall internal and international affairs related and affecting their countries  (Enderwick 2020).

So in all this essay had described the similarities and differences of hyper-globalizers and transformationalist whereby the hyper-globalizers take government as losing powers in the globalized world while transformationalist does not look at government as losing power but transforming to these changes and influences they get, while covid 19 supporting hyper-globalizers that indeed the world is boardless but the government is still in power they didn’t lose all their control as the nations state were in control of their countries in times of the pandemic killing their citizens.