The OJ Simpson Trial Essay Sample

O.j Simpson was remorseful of the assassination of Ronald Goldman, his spouse's friend, and Nicole Brown Simpson, his wife. This study will discuss whether the United States' criminal justice is blemished or fair based on his murder trial.

Firstly, the two individuals outside the condominium of Brown were stabbed to death in Los Angeles in the year 1994. Taken to court, O.J.Simpson was acquitted on 3rd October 1994 for a murder case. After the investigation, a glove full of blood was found behind his guest house. The trial in the United States was flawed because although the reasonable suspicion concerning DNA was represented as a piece of evidence in court, a division along races popped up. African-Americans assumed that fairness had not been shown by the "not guilty." In contrast, the white people, the common, supposed that it was racially driven board nullification.

Secondly, the trial became archaeologically crucial due to the reaction to the judgment, whereby the media christened the racial gap. In 2013, most current polling showed that the gap lessened since the trial stated that Simpson was guilty. The United States' criminal justice is fair since O.J.Simpson was found guilty, which was confirmed after murdering his wife and friend. Simpson desired a quick  trial, and the security of the impeaching attorneys operated to plan the case. Via Court Tv, this was publicized by a  TV camera that is a closed-circuit and some by other web cables. Media was used during the court-martial of O.J.Simpson.

Thirdly, the trial of O.J.Simpson was fair in the illicit justice structure of the United States since a civil suit was filed against Simpson by Goldman's dad. Simpson was found answerable for both the murder of Ronald Goldman and also Nicole Brown Simpson

However, Simpsons trial was fraud since the damages made, which were compensated to the Goldman household that amounted to 33,500,000 dollars, was just paid a minimal amount of the calculated figure. Simpson left for Florida, and his assets could not be taken to shelter liabilities acquired in other states

In conclusion, the unlawful fairness system of the United States is fair since O.J.Simpson was found guilty, which was confirmed after murdering his wife as well as his wife's friend. Also, the trial was adequate in the unlawful uprightness system of the United States since a civil suit was filed against Simpson by the father of Goldman, and Simpson was found accountable for both the murder of Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson. However, the trial was fraud since damages made to Goldman were not fully compensated.