Persuasive Essay On Sweatshops
Sweatshops, which the majority consider to be modern slavery, are frequently criticised by society. Sweatshops with many hazardous objects, if not harmful working environments such as overcrowding, are among the many justifications that I believe are reasonable. Furthermore, given the number of hours they work, their pay is deemed to be extremely poor. Sweatshop workers, on the other hand, see it as their only alternative since they grew up with little education and were unable to get suitable jobs.
Sweatshops are frequently congested, with workers being exploited by upper management, resulting in an unsafe working environment. Workers who should be coming to work in safe settings instead report to work in awful conditions, and instead of creating employment or a better or safer workplace, they are producing even more chaos. 250 million children aged 5 to 14 are forced to labour for up to 16 hours every day in sweatshops. Sweatshops manufacture goods for Western markets such as clothing, shoes, and toys; they are large corporations' primary manufacturers and are critical to their survival. Furthermore, the equipment used in these sweatshops is frequently in poor condition and may be dangerous to handle. Workers are injured as a result of damaged parts. Some workers suffer minor injuries, while others have serious injuries that make them unable to work. Employees who are affected are removed from the work team without pay in such situations. Many sweatshops, from my viewpoint, should be abolished since they put a burden on workers' mental and physical health owing to their lack of concern for their workers and contempt for child labour laws.
Considering the hours put in, workers who work in sweatshops are rendered low-paid given the amount of dedication they put in. A common saying is, "Find what you enjoy doing," and individuals in such situations sometimes find themselves in these positions owing to their poor income and lack of education, making them unable to pick the best career for them. Most of the employees, who have little to no education and think they should work in these low-paying positions, place a high value on education. For example, garment workers in India are paid between Rs. 10,000 and 12,000 (AU $133 and 160) a month, but the cost of living is Rs. 29,323 (AU $386). These figures depict the pitiful wages that the average sweatshop worker in India gets. We have no option but to admit as a majority that a worker's salary concerning their living costs is unethical, which is another reason I unquestionably support the elimination of sweatshops in third-world nations.
In contrast, it is understandable why sweatshops play a factor for those in need of funding, as it is their only source of financial support. Many people who work in sweatshops all have something in common, and that is to provide for their families. Given their situation, they are unable to do so if sweatshops are abolished as a whole and would be poverty-stricken. Sweatshops not only help the poor but also help reduce homelessness so more people can have a roof over their heads. Buying cheaper things created in developing countries, therefore, not only makes you wealthy by saving money, but it also makes those in developing countries richer. Researcher Jeffery Kruger found sweatshop labour to raise incomes from 10% of American levels to 30% in just one generation (1990–2016). As pathetic as that may sound, it has a huge impact on the workers' daily lives and helps them move forward. For all these reasons, boycotting a sweatshop can be just as bad as it sounds, as it can lead to an additional crisis within families with an unstable income.
In conclusion, the broad definition of sweatshops is seen as morally wrong, whereas a slim portion of the population sees it as their only opportunity.
