"Texas: A Weak Governor State, or Is It?" by Ron Beal Article Analysis Essay Example

This review is over “Texas: A Weak Governor state or is it?” by Ron Beal from Baylor University. This essay will be giving an overview of How can the governor cause the laws to be faithfully executed. Greg Abbott’s expressing interest in being a major player in deciding rules and theories why? And did the legislature set a precedent for governor abbot involvement in rule making? The interpretive commentary to our current, 1876 Texas Constitution states our constitutional framers deliberately intended to weaken the executive branch of government. Texas was now commonly known as a weak governor state.

How can the governor cause the laws to be faithfully executed? When the framers written this into the constitution it was very broad and vague and only allows the governor to give guidance to the arrangement of affairs within the executive department branches. Many roles except the sectary of state are decided by the people and not the governor. Though these officials are selected by the people they largely depend on the governor, Influencing the officers for there positions may be in jeopardy. Even though the governor is trusted to faithfully execute what is right. The governor may appoint all statutory state officers to be subject of two-thirds of approval of their senate. This implies the govern is trusted with chances for the state officer’s chances for election and maintain their office after their term expires. This meaning it implies there is an unspoken bond to keep the officers from disagreement with the governor. Giving the governor power to maintain select state officers for which will do his bidding.

Greg Abbott’s has also expressed interest in being a major player in deciding rules and theories why? The Texas legislature has the abilities and rights to delegate rulemaking powers to regulatory agencies to carry out legislative purpose. Does this involved giving power to the governor to help him continue making the laws to be faithful? On June 22, 2018, the regulatory agencies were informed they must propose rules to the governor. So them and their staff can render the costs and benefits of the proposed agency actions. Governor Abbott is the first to assert such control over the agency rulemaking process in the history of Texas.  He did so not in the form of an executive order, but merely a letter.  Letters were not written by Governor Abbott himself, but by his Chief of Staff, Louis Saenz.  Finally, the letter did not order or request it to be done, but simply stated it was a clarification of the rulemaking process by reviewing all proposed rules before the agencies commenced the notice and comment rulemaking process. Implying Gregg abbot is not ordering agency officials but applying it a clarification of making remarks. This just shows even though power is limited for the governor. Texas governor Abbott really works his way around the situation to accomplish his goals. Insuring the people nothing gets past him unless he’s seen it before. Did the Legislature Intentionally Set a Precedent for the Governor’s Involvement in Rulemaking? Creating the question with the people knowing of this knowledge why have they continue to vote for him to stay in office?